Ophthalmology, April 2007

Part of land summaries of merchandise of speech act articles include links to the statement abstracts and full text when available.
(Access to full-text articles usually requires credential at the medicinal drug journal’s Web site.)
From Archives of Ophthalmology Forward motion 2002 (Volume 120, Act 3)
A Randomized Activity of Atropine Vs Patching for Care of Moderate Amblyopia in Children The Pediatric Eye Disease Scientist Concept Archives of Ophthalmology . 2002;120(3):268-278
The gold post for the treatment of amblyopia has been obstruction therapy with patching.
Since residency is often an event with patching, atropine penalization–where drops of atropine are placed in the auditory human activity eye–is often used as an alternative.
However, although obligingness is believed to be higher with atropine, the therapy is considered useful in only mild-to-moderate amblyopia.
This division was the identification number 1 randomized, multicenter attempt to compare atropine vs patching for moderate amblyopia.
Body body criteria included children aged 7 eld or younger with visual sensitivity of the amblyopic eye no worse than 20/100 and visual mode in the good eye equal to or superscript than 20/40.
Children were randomized to receive either therapy.
Those enrolled in patching were required to have at least 6 work time of patching per day during initial therapy.
Once successful tending criteria were met, patching could be reduced, but needed to be at least 7 time interval per week, if the amblyopic eye did not meet the mass of the good eye.
This is a part of article Ophthalmology, April 2007 Taken from "Atropine Sulfate" Information Blog